Currency market possesses a certain
dynamics that no other financial markets have. Unlike in the case of equity or
fixed income markets, the mainstream of forex market traders is speculators in
one way or another.
Global merchandise trade going
through the forex market makes up around 1–2% of total volume. Allowing foreign
direct investment, we increase the volume contribution to about 5%.
Asset market volumes have risen
sharply over the past 20 years as barriers to capital have fallen. Having made
up only a small proportion of currency market volume before the end of the
Bretton Woods exchange rate system, they probably now make up as much as 35% of
total currency market volume on a daily basis.
That being said, there is still 60% of daily currency market volume, which has to be assigned to “speculation”. Despite the fact that the figures presented here are very approximate, the idea of proportions is pretty clear.
Economic theory tackles the issue of
exchange rates by trying to discover a theoretical equilibrium level, against
which one can measure over, or undervaluation relative to the actual exchange
rate. Such theory relies on a number of significant grounds which may influence
the exchange rates:
Exchange rates replicate all existing
information at any one time
There is perfect information distribution
(meaning, no-one has an advantage)
While it is still unclear whether
these factors occur in other financial markets, they are clearly presented in
the forex trading market.
Some refer to fx market as a
“perfect” market, with tones of available information and perfect efficiency to
motivation.
Unfortunately, currency market is
hardly perfect. Information is not perfect as some market participants are able
to gain more knowledge than others. Why does this happen?
· There is just too much information to
comprehend. No trader can possibly absorb it all.
· The information is not perfect and
some traders do have an advantage over others. For example, the clue about
specific flows that may happen, a bank’s personal “order book” and the ability
to trade larger currency transactions than other traders.
Knowledge in forex is power. And
since this power is not distributed in an equal manner, forex trading has an
element of competition.
The more information is available to
us, the less we actually have the time to read. If the good news is that we are
closer to perfect knowledge than we have ever been, then the bad news is that
we are never likely to get there!
Information costs money to deliver
and therefore there is not “perfect” information delivery
because not everyone gets it, either
at all or at the same time. Even if it were free, “information
overload” still means that not
everyone reads and uses it at the same time.
To summarize, there is neither
perfect information nor perfect information dispersal—and there never will be.
In response, an economist might argue that we have “good” information, if not
perfect information. It would be tough to argue with this, but then “good” is
not “perfect” and “perfect” is a necessary aspect of the equilibrium concept.
Furthermore, this supposed
equilibrium level is rarely ever reached. Real life is surely a
constant state of flux and imbalance,
so why should financial markets be any different?
In turn, if one assumes that the
economic fundamentals that can affect exchange rates are themselves in a
constant state of flux, one must equally assume that the equilibrium itself is
in a constant state of flux—which to an extent calls into question the idea of
it being an “equilibrium” in the first place.
In truth, it is a signpost on a road.
It points you in the right direction, but it gives
you no idea of when you will get there or where you
might have to turn off along the way.